In a 90-minute briefing late last week, policy analysts at the Center for Disease Control (CDC) were told by CDC officials who oversee its budget that it’s no longer allowed to use seven words or phrases as ordained by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), The Washington Post reported Friday.

The ban included: “vulnerable,” “entitlement,” “diversity,” “transgender,” “fetus,” “evidence-based” and “science-based.”

Policy analysts were left outraged, and the public reacted to the controversy in the wake of the Post’s article about the banned words.

The Post interviewed one unnamed analyst present at the meeting who described the reactions of individuals in the room as “incredulous.”

The analyst said:

It was very much, “Are you serious? Are you kidding?” … In my experience, we’ve never had any pushback from an ideological standpoint.

Several officials have made public statements explaining that the words were not banned from use in scientific documents, but in relation to documents pertaining to the CDC’s budget for the next year, which is set to be released in February, the Post reported.

However, others were not persuaded by the administration’s reassurances and remained concerned that the “banned” words have greater ramifications concerning the quality of future research at the CDC and on people’s lives — particularly people who identify as transgender and women, who may feel that the banned words can infringe on their reproductive health and rights.

ninjaMonkeyStudio/Getty Images

According to The New York Times, the Post’s report on the banned words is not completely accurate. The ban is said to have originated from the HHS.

Matt Lloyd, a spokesman from the agency wrote in an email:

The assertion that H.H.S. has ‘banned words’ is a complete mischaracterization of discussions regarding the budget formulation process. H.H.S. will continue to use the best scientific evidence available to improve the health of all Americans. H.H.S. also strongly encourages the use of outcome and evidence data in program evaluations and budget decisions.

The Times also reported that an unnamed former federal official explained why CDC analysts were told to stop using the words.

The former official said:

It’s absurd and Orwellian … but they are not saying to not use the words in reports or articles or scientific publications or anything else the C.D.C. does. … They’re saying not to use it in your request for money because it will hurt you. It’s not about censoring what C.D.C. can say to the American public. It’s about a budget strategy to get funded.

However, a few officials are still wary of the word ban, including Michael Halpern the deputy director of the Center for Science and Democracy, who told the Times:

The fact that the agency began controlling what scientists can say to reporters a few months ago doesn’t suggest they want to be open and honest with the public.

But like Lloyd, in a series of tweets she posed Sunday, Dr. Brenda Fitzgerald, the director of the CDC, maintained that there won’t be any banned words at the agency:

Words like “vulnerable,” “diversity” and “transgender” may strike a chord with individuals across the United States, as those may be words that they would use to describe themselves. Many took to Twitter to express their fear and dismay at the move.

Many citing George Orwell’s “1984” and voicing a fear that the administration is taking steps toward authoritarianism:

Other topics to the word ban relate to women’s health. Some women were fearful that banning the word “fetus” meant switching it out with “baby.” Many were afraid this would infringe on their reproductive rights:

Others pointed out that the word “fetus” is important to CDC studies that aim to find ways of lowering miscarriage rates:

Some believed that the main targets of the ban were women and transgender people:

Another trend on Twitter was users coming up with tweets using all the banned words:

Administration officials claim that the “banned words” are a “mischaracterization” of the HHS meeting with CDC analysts, the Times reported. But the public reaction to reports of the ban seemed to indicate something much more significant: a sizable population that fears and mistrusts the direction the federal government is moving in and its interference in their lives.

Leave a comment

We are excited to announce Dearly has joined forces with Mama’s Uncut. Helping Mom’s across the United States answer questions on life’s big challenges.

DEARLY JOINING FORCES WITH MAMA'S UNCUT